Thursday, August 11, 2011

Real Estate Downturn v2? Probably not.

August 2011


Since 2008 both the economy and the real estate markets have been put through a roller coaster of both real and perceived threats. It is safe to say with a large degree of qualitative and quantitative hindsight the ’08 crisis as it related to real estate was very real and there is some lingering, although greatly diminished, effects of that today. So what does the current crop of economic news mean to the real estate market?? That is the question we will try to better understand here.


The first thing to do is look at the 2008 market. The cause of the Fall 2008 crisis was predominately driven by two colliding failures:


1. The residential housing bubble finally collapsed deflating values by 25% - 40% depending on the region of the country.


2. Many of our financial institutions were undercapitalized and near a state collapse. Largely as a result of poorly underwritten residential mortgages.


The good news from this is that our country’s economic fundamentals are far stronger today than those present during the Fall 2008 and Spring 2009 financial crisis. We have consolidated our financial institutions into larger and arguably healthier banks due to more internal and government oversight. The Federal Reserve has made access to capital both plentiful and affordable. The residential housing market remains unpredictable; however, new home building is nearly a zero in our GDP so clearly the broader real estate market is not poised for a collapse.


In fact the volatility we are now navigating is not from a lack of economic confidence; it is one of a complete lack of political confidence. To quote Moody’s it is “the risk of political polarization and uncertainty that are among the drivers of our negative outlook”…on the USA and its debt. The Chief Investment Officer shared thoughts illustrating that our underlying real (or adjusted) GDP growth might be 3% v the recently reported 0.8%. Three phenomena seem to have constrained GDP from 3% to 0.8%. They were:


· The disruption in global supply chains as a result of the Japan earthquake (.25%)


· The increasing cost of oil which resulted in reduced consumer spending (1%).


· USA government fiscal policy, or lack thereof (1%).


If we believe the above are somewhat temporary and political rhetoric can be channeled to fiscal responsibility, then we may see GDP increase in the second half of 2011 to over 2%.


While all of this macroeconomic news is interesting, it certainly affects our local real estate markets. In the San Francisco Bay Area, we are a largely supply constrained market. In the six counties Pacific Union serves, only two counties really experienced over building in the pre-2007 housing boom. As a result, inventories are manageable and not causing downward pressure on pricing. Pacific Union (PUI) has representation across all of the Bay Area’s major markets and our regional managers weighed in with the following observations from our San Francisco, Marin and other selected regions:


· San Francisco – The market seems stable with typical light activity as expected in summer. Multiple new escrows in process and mainly in $1.25 to $2.25 million range.


· Marin – High-end of market is performing well. The larger share of sales activity is priced over $2m and all buyers seem stable, committed and feel values are still appropriate.


· Napa – The high-end of market is very active with multiple deal closing in excess of $7m.


· Sonoma – Like Napa there is no evidence of stress in this market as well.


As we look forward hopefully our politicians have read a few recent headlines and now feel the demand for fiscal responsibility to start stabilizing the markets. As for local real estate, as our children return to school we expect to see an increase in listing inventory and increasing units sold through Thanksgiving. Interest rates remain at historic lows (mortgages are “on-sale”) and real estate is relatively inexpensive. While many will retreat and wait for the comfort zone (near the next peak), now is the time to seek opportunity and buy! That said, for those who have high quality homes in good locations that are looking to sell expect price pressure, but nothing like we saw a couple of years ago.


Thursday, February 24, 2011

The Cost of Waiting for Prices to Fall

Reproduced by permission of Adam Wise of MSP Loan

Many purchasers have been sitting on the sidelines waiting for home prices to hit bottom. They want to guarantee that they are purchasing at the best possible price. Like them, we also believe that prices still have some room to fall in most markets. However, we disagree that waiting is a good financial decision. The buyer should not be concerned about housing prices. They should be concerned about cost.

The cost of a house is made up of the price AND THE INTEREST RATE they will be paying. Two different pieces of news released yesterday highlight this point…

Prices
The National Association of Realtors (NAR) released their 4th quarter housing research report. In the release, they reported that home sales rose 15.4% in the 4th quarter over the 3rd quarter. They also showed that prices remained stable during the year. The national median existing single-family price was $170,600 in the fourth quarter, up 0.2 percent from $170,300 in the fourth quarter of 2009. A buyer who delayed a purchase might find solace in the fact that prices have not increased. However, the other news released yesterday paints a different picture.

Interest Rates
The Primary Mortgage Market Survey was released by Freddie Mac which showed that the 30 year fixed rate mortgage was at 5.05%. Frank Nothaft, vice president and chief economist of Freddie Mac said: “Long-term bond yields jumped on positive economic data reports, which placed upward pressure on mortgage rates this week…As a result, interest rates on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rose to the highest level since the last week in April 2010.” So prices have remained stable but interest rates have risen dramatically in the last 90 days. What does that mean to a buyer looking to purchase a home this year?

The price is the same. It just costs more.
Let’s show you what the news means:



By sitting on the sidelines for the last 90 days a purchaser lost:
• $ 439.78 a month
• $ 5,277.36 a year
• $ 158,320.80 over the thirty year life of the mortgage

The Bottom Line
Even if prices fall another 10% this year, the cost of a home will increase if interest rates go up more than 1%. Buyers should not worry where prices are going. They should be concerned where costs will be later in the year. Work with your local MSP Loan Mortgage Consultant to customize flyers for your buyer's that will illustrate the effect that the still rising interest rates will have on their home purchase.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

2010 Was the Year of the Missing Spring

As the year ended I decided to look back on the year and try to make sense of what was *not* a normal year by any stretch of the imagination. By that I am speaking of how we in the real estate world look at cyclical trends throughout the year. Take 2009 for example: It looks like how real estate cycles typically play out over the course of any given year. To gauge performance I looked at the percentage of homes in contract as a measure of how the market was absorbing inventory across all 13 major Marin county cities. A measurement of over 35% in contract is usually indicative of a sellers' market. 25% in contract is usually indicative of a buyers' market. 25%-35% in contract indicates a balanced market. If we look at the 2009 numbers we saw a real estate market in the midst of a reasonably strong recovery. That shouldn’t be all that difficult to imagine in contrast to the truly difficult years of 2007 and 2008.



The key sub components of this graph to note is where the buying cycles typically occur. I think we are all used to seeing “for sale” signs going up as the days get longer and the weather gets better in March. This is the official start of the spring selling season and 2009 indeed shows a nice healthy upswing in inventory reduction from March to June much like and other typical year. Then comes the summer lull from June to September and again 2009 does not disappoint in terms of meeting typical expectations. The secondary sales cycle starts in September and runs through October and is usually a weaker upward trend compared to its spring brethren. In 2009, though, that expected trend took and unique turn. A general feeling that the worst of the economic downturn coupled with pent up buying demand and low inventory created an atypical surge in buying that propelled the market into what was beginning to look like a seller’s market for the first time in 3 to 4 years. Maybe both the economy and the real estate market was back on track? Not so fast. Read on…

The Spring 2010 Selling Season That NEVER Happened

Having been in the real estate market for 17 years I am hard pressed to remember a situation that I witnessed in 2010. There was literally NO spring real estate selling cycle this year. As mentioned above, we started the year hopeful, but many realities came home to roost. Let me see if I can rattle of a few of the key drivers that shattered the nerves of anyone considering buying a home this last spring: Huge deficit concerns, a meltdown in European banking across multiple weaker member states like Greece, the fallout from passing the Healthcare bill, the stark reality that job growth will not happen in 2010, the return of home foreclosures, continued war in the middle east and so on and so on. These factors are clearly reasons for people to rationalize sitting tight. The result: A steep decline in activity this last spring that totally eliminated the typical and expected upward sales trend from March through June. Even in 2008 when the market was still reeling from the recent banking collapse we saw this expected upswing, but not this year.


Does a Stronger Fall Mean An Improving Market in 2011?

The fall actually got off to an early start with an early upswing in activity starting in the typically slow June/July timeframe as inventories were being absorbed across the county. Once all of this bad news was digested and most people understood that although things we tough, they actually were getting better (albeit with expectations set that it will likely be very slow but steady) then the market got back in gear. With news that job growth was looking better, European banks stabilizing, inflation well in check and the Fed committing to low interest rates through 2011, the market experienced a stronger than average upswing in the typically tepid Fall selling cycle. One could assert that those buyers that were looking to buy in the fall and deferred in the Spring got back in the market. So as we close 2010, we are almost where we were last year! We are edging up and through a balanced market with trend lines pointing towards a more robust new year. That is what we saw last year and if we have all learned anything it is to expect the unexpected. The overall economy and real estate markets will continue to surprise us in both positive and negative ways, but if/should things actually continue to improve across the board in 2011 with no big surprises disrupting advancement then May/June 2010 may have been the recent bottom. That of course is speculation and I will keep you abreast of where the market continues to go in the coming year.

I’m looking forward to working with you in 2011!

Sharon Kramlich
Top Producer
Pacific Union Real Estate Estates Division

415-609-4473
skramlich@pacunion.com
www.sharonkramlich.com